Graduate students often experience high levels of stress due to heavy workloads, limited autonomy, work-life conflict, power imbalances, and financial and career issues. High-quality graduate supervision is crucial for their academic, professional, and personal growth, as strong faculty-student supervisory relationships enhance outcomes and satisfaction for both students and faculty. However, when these relationships are strained or fractured, it can lead to significant negative impacts on satisfaction, well-being, and mental health, as well as academic, career, financial, and personal consequences. Additionally, mental health and substance use problems among students and faculty can further challenge supervisory relationships, which can have ripple effects throughout the academic environment.
While most graduate students at McMaster University will have a positive supervisory experience, current reports indicate that about 10% of doctoral students run into challenges that impact experience and completion time during graduate studies. While work has been previously done at McMaster to understand supervisory challenges, a strategy to address this issue has not been developed and limited resources have been applied.
The Grow Grads Project goals:
Identify stepped, strategic priorities to strengthen graduate student and faculty supervisory relationships and address current needs and gaps, together with institutional leaders
Outline an educational curricula (education, training, tools) and training opportunities for graduate students and faculty which can be developed and implemented at McMaster.

Process
- Scanned existing literature and graduate student supervision initiatives in other Universities
- Scanned existing McMaster documents reporting on supervision
- Scanned existing McMaster documents related to graduate student
- Conducted interviews with individual stakeholders (Associate Deans from faculties)
- Consulted with external groups (other universities and specific programs)
- Presented initial findings to Grad Dean’s Council for feedback
- Conducted 2 focus group co-design sessions (total of 4 focus groups) with faculty, staff, and graduate students
Project Findings
Summary findings from these internal reports highlight that students and supervisors need the opportunity to:
- Get to know each other as individuals, with increased awareness to differences in ability, gender, minority status, culture, and life circumstances
- Communicate needs and experiences
- Receive clear expectations and flexible timelines
- Try new ideas and have a chance to fail with support
- Be encouraging of each other
When compared to the other universities in Canada, McMaster University demonstrates leadership in access to supervision materials, with guidebooks, supervision policies, contracts/forms, and complaints handling processes available and housed in a single location
Development of additional supports and resources at Mc Master University should consider: conflict resolution, online training/education of supervisory relationships, public/professional recognition and incentivization of graduate supervision.
Clear links have been made between a good supervisory relationship and mental health. Both student and supervisor mental health can deteriorate if the relationship deteriorates. From internal reports – noted repeatedly that “empathy” is required to support a healthy graduate student – faculty supervisor relationship – this requires mutual understanding of different perspectives and changing circumstances.
Five faculties were represented: feedback and interviews were conducted with Associate Deans, staff, and faculty. The following were key findings from these conversations:
Mentorship and Skills Training: There is a need for mentorship and skill training, with an emphasis on communication skills
Context Matters: Different contexts (e.g., lab vs. one-on-one support) change the look and shape of graduate supervisory relationships. Different cultures and climates (i.e., programs, departments, Faculties) are also important to understand and address.
Access to the Right Supports at the Right Time: Currently there are interventions to support faculty and students when a problem is identified. However, there is less available to identify and help resolve issues before they become a problem (prevention vs. intervention). Additionally, existing resources are not always utilized, and there is variability in how these resources are experienced (both positive and negative).
Prioritizing Excellence in Supervision
- Barrier: Supervision has not been prioritized or incentivized to the same degree as other supervision responsibilities like research output
- Recommendation: incentivize positive supervision, regular check-ins to give and receive feedback for both student and supervisor, timely (early) intervention
Centralized Resource Hub
- Barrier: There is inconsistency in how resources specific to graduate student-faculty supervision are developed, implemented, and translated into practice. Students and supervisors reported an inability to find information when needed, and a lack of consistency across Faculty and department made policy and protocols difficult to navigate
- Recommendation: A central access point where students and supervisors can go to access information
Need for Navigation
- Barrier: Navigators need to be implemented to support supervisors and students to receive the right information at the right time. Due to existing power imbalances, the navigator should not be tied to a department, to decrease potential for bias and increase likelihood of students and staff approaching
- Recommendation: Full-time paid positions to be created for navigation. These navigators will work separately from the department and be available for both supervisors and students as needed.
Education and Skills Training
- Barrier: There is a reported lack of training for supervisors and students in two areas:
- McMaster University policies, available resources, and supports for graduate students and supervisors
- Social and emotional skills to manage supervisory relationships
- Recommendation: Training should be offered at regular intervals to support students and faculty
- Topics include managing positive relationships, best practices for graduate student-faculty supervision, conflict management, relationship building, role clarity, financial support, grant applications, and McMaster student policies.
Recommendations & Next Steps
Education and Training: Supervision orientation, education, and training for graduate students and faculty, embedded in centralized graduate student, and faculty professional and personal development offerings. Examples may include peer and expert-led workshops and sessions, and ensuring up-to-date and easily accessible information available on one central website
Navigation Support: Central Navigation and Conflict Resolution Support for graduate students and faculty experiencing challenges in the supervisory relationship, provided at arm’s length from and in collaboration with programs and faculties, is required.
Policy & Process Renewal and Revision: To support and guide training, education, and navigation support, an improved approval, evaluation, and renewal process for supervisors is required. Development of an improved faculty code of conduct is required and underway. Improve graduate student supervisor policy (building on PhD policy) is also needed and intended.
Communication Strategies: To increase awareness and understanding of the aforementioned recommendations for both students and supervisors.

Project Team and Collaborators
Core Project Team
- Emma Bruce
- Mojan Naisani Samani
- Allan Fein
- Andrea Cole
- Lynn Armstrong
- Catharine Munn
Project Collaborators
|
|
This project was financially supported by a Garden Grant from the MacPherson Institute and the McMaster Office of the Provost.